Search Site
Search Google
Home
DRI Blog
For The Defense
Find a Lawyer
Amicus Briefs
Blawgs
Reference Links
The Court Reporter
Commercial Litigation
Drug & Medical Device
Environmental Law
Insurance Law
Labor & Employment Law
Life, Health and Disability
Product Liability
Technology
Featured Articles
Article Category Filter
View Latest Articles
Admiralty Law
Alternative Disput Resolution
Amicus Curiae
Appellate Advocacy
Asbestos
Aviation Law
Bankruptcy
Class Action
Commercial Litigation
Construction Law
Damages
Discovery
Diversity
Drug and Medical Device
Electronic Discovery
Employment Law
Entertainment Law
ERISA
Expert Witness
Government Enforcement and Corporate Compliance
Governmental Liability
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International Law
Life, Health & Disability
Maritime Law
Medical Liability and Health Care Law
Product Liability
Professional Liability
Professionalism and Ethics
Retail and Hospitality
Social Media
Sports Law
Supreme Court
Technology
Toxic Torts and Environmental Law
Trial Tactics
Trucking Law
Voir Dire
Women In The Law
Workers' Compensation
Young Lawyers
Workers' Compensation
An Update on Workers’ Compensation Fraud in Illinois
John Flodstrom, Heyl Royster Voelker
The fraud provisions were codified in Section 25.5 of the Workers' Compensation Act. Paragraph (a) sets forth the acts deemed to be unlawful, and states as follows:
view more
The Independent Contractor Analysis In Illinois Trucking Cases
Craig S. Young, Heyle Royster Voelker & Allen
Illinois cases involving truck drivers and deliverymen have provided fertile litigation ground over the employee/independent contractor distinction. In the trucker and deliverymen cases, the courts often analyze numerous factual issues which can often tip the consideration either way. While the cases are very fact-specific and somewhat unpredictable, they do give us some guidance as to what courts find important when making this key determination. It is important to note that these cases often (but not always) depend on whether the Commission found the claimant was an employee or independent contractor. This is because the applicable standard of review on appeal is the deferential "manifest weight of the evidence" standard. Therefore, the Commission's employee/independent contractor determination is usually reversed only if it was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
view more
Utilization Review In Workers Compensation Cases: Use Or “Abuse Of Process”
Scott P. Hooker
Disputes between a injured workers and their employer or insurer over the approval of and payment for medical treatment is not a new phenomenon. In
Garvin v. Shewbart
, 442 So.2d 80 (1983), an employee sued her employer and its carrier for bad faith and outrage arising out of their failure to pay for treatment she received as a result of an on-the-job injury. The Alabama Supreme Court, relying on an earlier decision in
Waldon v. Hartford Insurance Group
, 435 So.2d 1271 (Ala.1983), held that Garvin's bad faith refusal to pay was barred by the exclusivity provisions of Alabama's Workers Compensation Act.
view more
DRI Resources
About DRI
Join DRI
Continuing Legal Education
DRI Store