As anyone who has defended a trucking case knows, you basically start out with one -- if not two -- strikes against you. Generally speaking, jurors have negative opinions of defendant trucking companies. Plaintiff's attorneys know this, and can usually find something (e.g,. a DOT violation, previous tickets or accidents involving the driver in question, etc.) to attempt to inflame the jury. These difficulties can be compounded by the venue in which the case is pending. Generally speaking, this is determined by either the location of the accident or where the defendant resides or does business. Depending on the venue, the facts of the case may not matter in some places as much as they do in others. As an example of this, there was recently a case tried in the state in which I practice (Alabama) involving a minor rear-end collision, only $2,500 of retail medical bills and absolutely no "heat" in the case. After deliberating briefly, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $250,000. On the other hand, it is important to note that some of even the more rural venues depend on trucking companies as being vitally important to the local economy, and thus are more friendly towards trucking companies than one would assume.
view more